December 7, 2010

I have been actively writing a brief for the ROM so tonight I will share something I wrote in March, 2001.

Thoughts on Self Determination

I was searching on the internet the other day and I found that the phrase “self determination” brought up a large number of articles on political sovereignty for colonized nations and for aboriginal groups. This got me to thinking again about the use these words when people talk about and plan with people who are labeled disabled.

Most groups in the world gained their distinctive identity because they have a definite geographical or ecological boundary, or because they share a culture. In my country, Canada, there are aboriginal groups who descend from people who lived as prairie hunters or woodland gatherers or tundra dwellers. Today they are fighting for their sovereignty -- their right to decide for themselves how to use their own resources, solve their own problems and conduct their own business, education and government. Also, the people who are descendants of settlers from France are also fighting for their self determination in Canada -- their sovereignty. They have remained a distinct group in the broader Canadian population because their language is still strong and vital, able to be used in everyday affairs of business and politics. French speaking people live mostly in the province of Quebec and so this group also has a geographic location and definition.

Are people who have been classified as disabled such a group? I don’t think so. Rather than being naturally a separate group, we are born, or acquire our “disability” identity, everywhere among people. We share every geography, ecology, language and culture with all human beings.

The term “self determination” is used in a different way when we are thinking of people who are labeled disabled. For us self determination is defined -- not as sovereignty -- but as Freedom, Authority, Support, and Responsibility. Advocates of self determination for people who are called disabled view these principles as the cornerstones that are required for a person to live a life of full participation in society.

Ever since I first heard the words “self determination” used in relationship to people who are considered disabled I have not liked this term. Don’t get me wrong. I work everyday to help make it possible for everyone to live in their own communities, choose their own homes and life styles, get good incomes, be respected, have friends and loved ones, and make the contributions they want to make through employment or in other ways that make sense to them.

It’s just that people who have great lives are not independent and not self determined -- no matter whether they are labeled able or disabled. All human life is made possible through relationship. Everything we know, everything we choose, everything we learn or do is in some way connected to other human beings. It is not more separateness that leads to vibrant lives of contribution, it is a better quality of relationship and cooperation. Independence does not lead to sovereignty in one’s own life -- the right sorts of relationship do!

The more powerful and fulfilled a person is the better is the quality of her or his relationships with other people. Powerful people influence and are influenced by thousands of other people. People listen to them and respect them -- they themselves also listen to and respect many other people. People who are fulfilled make choices based on knowledge and support garnered in a vast array of relationship -- personal and public, paid and unpaid, intimate and casual.

In other words a really good way to stay poor and isolated and unable to have a very good life is to keep trying to be independent!

“Disability” is really a lie. “Disability” is the idea that some people, because their bodies or minds or emotions function in ways that are unusual, are somehow unable to live fully as human beings. The truth is that every human being has some ordinary ways of being and some unusual ways. Everyone suffers sometimes and has burdens and sometimes burdens others. Everyone also has times of joy, sometimes gives something to someone else, and has the possibility of creating opportunity for others in the world. Paradoxically the most common thing about people is that everyone has unique ways of being themselves.

In our world the disability label is used as a way to set people apart from society. In other words “disability” is used as an excuse to deny us the sort of relationships and cooperation that would allow us to take our full place along side of other citizens in a diverse community.

There really is no lack of money or resources. And although there is always room for learning better ways to support people, we really do know basically how to include everyone together in one world. The question is: “Will we?”

The question: “Will we?” is not a question of personal independence and self determination. It is a question of relationship and politics. We are all citizens, regardless of ability. How are people who are called disabled going to take their full place in the world? We all need to take a part in answering this question.

A mistaken sense that self determination is the concern of one individual has often led to more of the same old thing. Those who don’t understand or want full participation everywhere can easily dress up segregation and oppression as choice. Too often, for example, a person is offered a “choice” between a group home, isolated living in an agency owned apartment or living as a paying guest in someone else’s family. Choosing between options that all are designed to keep you small is not real citizenship, whether or not it is self determination.

Advocates, family members and we who are labeled disabled must seek a deeper vision. We are human and society must reflect our human reality as much as it reflects the human reality of those who imagine their abilities are perfect and permanent. We must imagine a society where our unique and our ordinary contributions are opportunities for everyone and where we fundamentally belong. Such a society is the birthright of all people.

In the long run perhaps it doesn‘t really matter whether advocates continue to use the words “independent” and “self determination”. What matters, I believe, is that we continue to spread the vision that all abilities are needed in community to make the world complete and whole. Let us continue to work to make this vision real.